Best 25 Usace Alternative Sites Analysis + Wildlight

BUILDING STRONG Alternatives Evaluation Pursuant to 33 CFR Part 325, Appendix B, USACE will in all cases, exercise independent judgment from both the applicant’s and the public’s perspective. Once the basic and overall project purpose is defined, USACE must evaluate alternatives that are

that doesn't rule that parcel out as a practicable alternative. The applicant should consider and anticipate alternatives available during the timeframe that USACE conducts its alternatives analysis. An evaluation of availability for purchase and projected cost can be included here. BUILDING STRONG

USACE Decision USACE is neither an opponent nor a proponent of the applicant's proposal. o 33 C.F.R. Part 325, Appendix B, Paragraph 9.b.(5) Decision options available to the district commander, which embrace all of the applicant's alternatives, are:  Issue the permit  Issue with modifications or conditions  Deny the permit

 In the evaluation of Section 404 permit applications to discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S (WOTUS), including wetlands, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is required to analyze alternatives that could achieve the purpose and need.